Thursday, 15 April 2010

British Cinema Case Study: Amber Films


Amber is a film & photography collective, founded in the Newcastle upon Tyne in 1969, incorporating Amber Films, Side Gallery, Side Cinema and Side Café (http://www.amber-online.com/), with a self-determined remit to record working-class life in its region. The work is rooted in social documentary, built around long-term engagements with working class and marginalized communities in the North of England. There is an integrated approach to production (which includes documentaries, dramas and photographic projects), publication (including exhibitions, books, DVDs and works created specially for the web) and distribution.

The approach is celebratory, even when the marginalization of lives and landscapes makes this more difficult. Production grows out of the relationships with these communities, and creativity is inseparable from that of the people with whom Amber works. Rooted in practical craft skills (camera work, direction, editing, sound, etc), there is an egalitarian, collective approach to the filmmaking. Technological innovation has made the different processes ever more democratically accessible, and Amber has taken advantage of this to extend its on-going experiment in collective creativity.

Amber's contribution to British film culture should, therefore, be located both within an important strand of independent film-making, and a tradition of social realism that dates from the documentary movement of the 1930s but that also has clear antecedents in post-war European neo-realism.

Amber's first film, Maybe (1969), had its origins as a student film by Murray Martin and Graham Denman. Having obtained financial support from Northern Arts (Amber's only continuous sponsor), they then produced Launch in 1973, documenting the construction and launch of a tanker at the Wallsend shipyards. Produced with a budget of only £400, Launch exemplifies Amber's approach to aesthetics, politics and working practices.

Amber is committed to accessibility This is one example, along with its geographical remoteness from London and its sometimes curious funding arrangements (including owning both a racehorse and a pub), of the genuine eccentricity that has played a part in Amber's survival.

With funding from Channel 4 under the terms of the ACTT Workshop Declaration, Amber produced its first feature film, Seacoal, in 1985. The result of two years living and working with the seacoalers, the film incorporates elements of straight documentary, improvised sketches and fully dramatised reconstructions. Contrary to the charge of romanticism that is sometimes levelled against Amber, their films such strive for an honest depiction of the frequently harsh realities of working-class life on the margins, one which certainly pays tribute to its dignity but which is far from romantic. Furthermore, the films stand as important social documents, as these different ways of life are steadily eradicated.

It is disappointing that films such as Amber's Like Father (2001), unlike mainstream productions set in a similar environment, such as Billy Elliott (d. Stephen Daldry, 2000), can only obtain a very limited theatrical release. Like Father is arguably Amber's most accomplished film to date, exemplifying their characteristic working practices (two years building the film in the community with a largely amateur cast, including the three main leads), their aesthetics and understated politics in a narrative that interweaves the personal and the political with genuine social authenticity and considerable emotion.

Over the past thirty three years, Amber have not merely survived but thrived, in spite of the erratic financial context for independent, regional and workshop production. It is unfortunate that a distribution and exhibition system increasingly aligned with mainstream commercial product has restricted opportunities for audiences to view their original, accessible and relevant films.

SHOOTING MAGPIES (2005) 80 mins; digital video
Fine performances and an unflinching gaze... New York Times
Special Mention, Britspotting Festival, Berlin 2006
Emma, a mother at fifteen, now in her early twenties, wants some kind of normality for herself and her two daughters in an area where drug use is common. When, one last time, Emma tries to get her partner Darren off heroin, ex-youth worker Barry is drawn into a chain of events that begins to threaten the relationship he has built with his son.

Set in post-industrial East Durham, in the North East of England, Shooting Magpies is a film about hope and survival. Shot on digital video, Shooting Magpies is the third feature film in Amber’s coalfield trilogy. The Scar (1997) looked at the lives of women after the Miners’ Strike and the campaign against closures. Like Father (2001) explored men’s lives.

Made with the financial support of Northern Rock Foundation, Northern Film & Media and Channel 4.

Music: composed, performed and produced by Rick Taylor & Frank Gibbon; recorded at Wildtrax Studio, County Durham; guest musicians: John Miles Jnr & Chuck Fleming.

THE MAKING OF SHOOTING MAGPIES - the film grew out of relationships, workshops and Coalfield Stories, a photographic programme to document changing lives and landscape that sprung from the making of Like Father in 1998. Barry Gough was one of the subjects of Peter Fryer’s Fathers. Emma Dowson was a participant in a video and photography project developed with a group of teenage mothers.

Many of the characters were living the lives they do in the film and the narrative emerged from the peole involved. Many local people (together with the Queen on a fleeting visit to the coalfield) appear as themselves in scenes where fiction and documentary is blurred.

Initial develpopment was funded by Channel Four, but when the broadcaster restructured its film department, Amber felt the need to reclaim some kind of independence and control so they decided to make the feature with considerably less expensive digital video, particularly when the filmmakers were pleased with the quality of the material that had been shot to research the production. Working with a small team, the film was shot with available light and virtually no location budget.

Digital video takes cost pressures off improvisation and experiment and digital editing allowed access to a far wider group of the filmmakers than traditional analogue editing. Amber had already used video in a variety of documentaries and it had benefited from National Lottery funding that enabled a switch to digital editing for Like a Father in 2001.

Further funding from Northern Rock, which was already supporting Amber’s photographic project, Coalfield Stories, not only facilitated the finishing of Shooting Magpies, but also helped the filmmakers plan for the future in a way that hadn’t been possible since the demise of funding from the Channel Four Film Workshop franchise.

The decision to use digital video came out of a desire to get on with things in the absence of a budget. DV allowed Shooting Magpies to be developed on the hoof, using available light. Cost pressures were taken off the experimental process and the production took on a life of its own, fitting around the cast’s daily lives and taking advantage of events happening around them.

Finance difficulties extended the shoot over eighteen months, and there were plenty of events to consider. In many ways it was a return to Amber’s approach in the 70s and early 80s: a small crew, flexible enough to exploit the unpredictable, incorporating it in an evolving narrative that draws its energy from the texture of people’s real lives.

Shooting Magpies has been distributed in a number of ways

1. There was a regional tour, which had three strands:
a) The communities of the people involved in making the film (Easington, Seaham, Thornley, Stanley, etc.)
b) Communities of interest associated with the film (support groups based around drug abuse and carers in that territory, family support groups, prisons/young offenders, etc.)
c) General film audiences (Tyneside Cinema, film societies, Side Cinema, etc)

2. There were screenings on the international festival/independent cinema circuit (Locarno, Vancouver, Berlin, Cork, New York, etc) and in London (BFI Southbank)

3. The film was nationally broadcast on More4 (Channel4 digital channel)

4. The film has been released as a DVD, available from Amber at Side Gallery or from our online shop.

There is also a trailer for the film, which can be seen on our website and which Amber put on YouTube.

Digital technology helps in the distribution in that it is easy to produce the work on DVD and that distributed version is of a much higher quality than was formerly possible via VHS. As things move on, it will be possible also to deliver the film as download. Amber are currently planning a web TV operation and may stream/make available as download a lower resolution version of Shooting Magpies along with other work.

Amber has what they call in the business world a 'long tail' operation. We own what we produce and continue to sell it in different versions over many years - we sell work to television and on DVD that was produced in the 1970s, 1980s, 1990s and 2000s. The strategy is to make more of this work available through digitisation (work for which we will also attract grants) thus increasing sales as a long term income strand. Our DVDs are short run, in-house productions, so we don't have to invest in stock and so we can adapt to changing formats. Digital technology has had an impact on distribution, and its impact will increase significantly in the coming years.

Funding

There was a £17,000 development grant from Channel 4. We had roughly £40,000 from Northern Film & Media. Amber supported some of the work through taking on a commercial project for Tyne & Wear Museums (audio visual material for Newcastle Discovery exhibitions) and they put some of their first year's revenue money from Northern Rock Foundation into it (say £40,000 of £100,000).

Over a three year period, they raised/spent maybe £100,000 to £120,000 on the film. At the same time, there were the Coalfield Stories photography projects, which, while they all delivered their own exhibitions/videos etc, contributed significantly to the research for the film. Amber raised around £170,000 for Coalfield Stories between 1999 and 2005.

It's also hard to say how much the film has made - again, Amber doesn't really look at it this way. Money is raised to make the work and that helps support making it. Any income then contributes to supporting the organisation long term. Amber is not a commercial organisation - the collective is interested in film as a cultural form.

The Film Council has decided to focus its support on the film industry and has made it clear that it isn't interested in cultural or regional film. Amber strongly disagree with this policy and feel that cultural and regional film is a vital part of the mix.

Amber received £10,000 for the screening on More4 (as part of a total package of £50,000 around four films).

New Technologies - Latest Development!

A recent development has been Side TV, a medium for streaming Amber's short & feature length films, documentaries, dramas, talks & animations, works from the archives & new productions. Amber films & programmes will be screened alongside ones by friends old & new and by the new generation of filmmakers gathering around the Amber operation.
http://www.sidetv.net/

Facebook site: http://www.facebook.com/?sk=messages#!/group.php?gid=165936219382&ref=search&sid=1242591314.2688273044..1

Trailer for Shooting Magpies (2005)

AS Film Industry - Sony: the 'Hollywood' model

/Five major companies dominate the UK film industry: United International Pictures, Warner Brothers, Buena Vista, Twentieth Century Fox and Sony. Nine out of every ten films shown in the UK are viewed as a result of these distributors and in most cases are linked to the Hollywood production companies who make the films. They deal with exhibitors who are no longer owned by the same Hollywood companies but, to make a profit, prioritise Hollywood films over others. Blockbuster films are often distributed via blanket release, so even if a small independent UK company gets its product into cinemas, it’s facing stiff, well-marketed competition from films that often take on the status of an event. Half the films released in Britain do not get shown around the whole country.

Sony is a multinational conglomerate corporation headquartered in Minato, Tokyo, Japan, and one of the world's largest media conglomerates with revenue of $78.88 billion U.S.

The Sony Group is engaged in business through its five operating segments – electronics, games, entertainment (motion pictures and music), financial services and other. These make Sony one of the most comprehensive entertainment companies in the world. Sony's principal business operations include Sony Corporation (Sony Electronics in the U.S.), Sony Pictures Entertainment, Sony Computer Entertainment, Sony Music Entertainment, Sony Ericsson, and Sony Financial.

The company initially developed from a company building electronic broadcasting and recording equipment to a one that also built the ‘software’ to play or record onto – including, along with Phillips, the CD - thus, potentially, cutting out the middle man and maximising profits.

In 1989, Sony acquired Columbia Pictures Entertainment, the American Film and television company – it could now make films with Sony equipment that could be watched in homes and (in some cases, Sony-owned) cinemas on Sony hardware. Beyond that, it had acquired Columbia’s back catalogue to be released on video and DVD which, in an ideal world, could be played on Sony hardware.

Sony has since created numerous other film production and distribution units, such as Sony Pictures Classics for art-house fare, by forming Columbia TriStar Pictures after merging Columbia Pictures and TriStar Pictures in 1998, and expanded its growth on April 8, 2005, when a consortium led by Sony acquired the legendary Hollywood studio Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) in a deal worth nearly $5 billion. Again, in an ideal world, the back catalogue releases would be played on Sony equipment.

Sony Pictures Home Entertainment manufactures and distributes the Sony film library on Blu-ray Disc, DVD, video cassette, and UMD forms to global markets.

The Columbia TriStar Motion Picture Group has a library of more than 4,000 films (including 12 Academy Award for Best Picture winners), and as of 2004 this unit of Sony distributes about 22 films a year under its various studio brands in 67 countries. The group owns studio facilities in the United States, Hong Kong, Madrid, Mexico, the United Kingdom, Brazil and Japan. In addition to the company-owned brands, Columbia TriStar also has a contract to distribute films for independent Revolution Studios and select films by MGM and United Artists.

Profits from its major studio successes allow it to back smaller, independent films through its companies like Destination Films, a "niche" motion picture company purchased by Sony in 2001 and Stage 6 Films, a direct to video/DVD label created in 2007.

It had its own cinema chain in which to exhibit its products; it has Sony Pictures Home Entertainment: Manufactures and distributes the Sony film library on Blu-ray Disc (a Sony product) and DVD. It has its own (or co-owned) film distribtion companies around the world, so it doesn’t have to look for a distributor abroad

It also owns Sony Music Entertainment, formed by successive mergers of various other companies, including Columbia Records, Epic and RCA. In 2008 Sony agreed to acquire the German company Bertelsmann's 50% stake in Sony BMG. Sony completed its acquisition of Bertelsmann Music Group on October 1, 2008. The company Sony Music Entertainment Inc became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Sony Corporation of America.

Artists signed to Sony can be found on Sony produced soundtracks of Sony films, like Spider-Man (2002), for example. If you like Chad Kroeger, you may go out and buy music from his band Nickleback on Road Runner Records, which is owned by Sony, or perhaps you enjoyed Aerosmith on the Spider-Man soundtrack, in which case, you might prefer to buy CDs from their back catalogue, which is owned by Sony!

Another branch of the company, Sony Pictures Digital oversees the digital production and online entertainment assets of Sony Pictures Entertainment, consists of Sony Pictures Imageworks, Sony Pictures Animation, Sony Pictures Mobile, Sony Pictures Digital Networks and others. It is known as the digital website interactive creator for SPE. Sony Pictures Digital designed websites for Sony Pictures, Screen Gems Network, SoapCity, Sony Pictures Imageworks, GSN, among others for SPE. Again, rather than look for a third party to do the work, Sony has its own facilities for digital production and special effects and can promote its product on company created websites. In fact, it it also serves other companies who pay Sony to do what they can’t – Sony Pictures Imageworks provides special effects – at a profit – for non-Sony movies too.

Another branch of the company, Sony Computer Entertainment, specialises in the production of hardware and software for ‘video’ and pc games, which often promote Sony (or Sony-licensed) product, like Spider-Man.

In 2001 Sony joined with the Swedish company Ericsson to manufacture mobile phones. The stated reason for this venture is to combine Sony's consumer electronics expertise with Ericsson's technological leadership in the communications sector. They now produce phones on which Sony movies can be watched, Sony websites can be accessed, Sony music can be listened to and Sony games can be played.

A recent move has seen a Sony deal with the major cinema chain AMC to install its digital projectors in all of the company's screens by 2012.

AS Film Industry - the Hollywood model: Vertical Integration, Convergence and Synergy


Hollywood dominates the market. A blockbuster film with a poor critical reception, like Pirates of the Caribbean II, can be a huge success thanks to the money spent on effective marketing. Dollars put into promoting it will guarantee an audience on the opening nights and the later buy first/review later DVD sales. The film made over £50 million at the UK box office and 1.5 million DVDs were sold in the first ten days of its release. Any British film up against the release of a major US film – for example, at the start of a holiday period, will be find it difficult to get attention amidst the level of marketing that takes place.

In the practice of Hollywood and other forms of industrial cinema, the phases of production, distribution and exhibition operate most effectively when 'VERTICAL INTEGRATED', where the three stages are seen as part of the same larger process, under the control of one company.

A successful company that has excelled at convergence and synergy in the film industry is the Japanese-owned but Hollywood-based Sony Pictures Entertainment.

CONVERGENCE is the integration of previoulsy separate technologies to achieve a particular aim - here, of course, it's to make, distribute, promote and exhibit a movie. In Sony's case, this has been achieved by developing the strengths of their own company, by acquiring other companies - or at least coming to a financial arrangement with them, which was the case with Marvel Comics (recently bought by Disney) and the making of Spider-Man, and branching out into areas of new technology, such as Sony Pictures Digital, which oversees digital production and the creation of websites to promote films and other products. On top of this, Sony Pictures Home Entertainment manufactures and distributes the Sony film library on Blu-ray Disc (which was co-created by Sony and which has seen off HDDVD, forcing other companies to adopt Blu-ray) and DVD.

SYNERGY is the promotion and sale of a product (and all its versions) throughout the various subsidiaries of a media conglomerate e.g. films, soundtracks or video games. Walt Disney pioneered synergistic marketing techniques in the 1930s by granting dozens of firms the right to use his Mickey Mouse character in products and ads, and continued to market Disney media through licensing arrangements. These products can help advertise the film itself and thus help to increase the film's sales. For example, for the first Spider-Man film, the soundtrack consisted of artists signed to Sony-Columbia, which would effectively promote the artists, the movie and, ultimately, increase revenue for Sony. The video for the theme song, by Chad Kroeger, featured scenes from the movie, thus promoting it. Although Kroeger's band, Nickelback, are signed to the independent Road Runner Records, it is actually owned by Sony-Columbia! At the time, Sony even co-owned its own cinema chain in which to show its films; although this is no longer the case, the company has struck a deal with cinema chain AMC, the second largest in North America, to install its digital cameras in all of its screens.

Wednesday, 14 April 2010

Fred Astaire and Michael Jackson - Smooth Criminal

A bit of a mess in places, but fun:

The Popular Press: Audience and Blumler and Katz' Uses and Gratifications Theory

Task: Audience survey
• What types of people prefer which newspapers / news websites?
• Try conducting a survey to find out who reads which newspaper / news
website. Ask a wide range of ages, both genders, and a range of different
types of people.
• Draw conclusions: do different newspapers/news websites appeal more to
older / younger audience groups?
– do different newspapers/news websites appeal more to different genders?
– do different newspapers/news websites appeal more to certain social groups?
• Look at the front page of a popular newspaper, or the home page of a popular
press website.
– Who is it aimed at? Decide the age, location, gender and income level of its
probable typical audience.
– How is it trying to appeal to this section of the demographic?

Uses and Gratifications: why are people interested in the news?

Blumler and Katz suggested people use the media to satisfy their needs. This
is called The Four Needs theory. It has four main parts –
1. Escape and diversion from everyday life
2. Surveillance and information
3. Personal relationships
4. Personal identity

Popular press and the Four Needs

1.Newspapers and websites can provide an escape from people’s own everyday life; the audience can get involved with different news stories, they can get carried away with the drama, the tragedy or the excitement and forget about their own lives and worries for a while.

2. Surveillance: newspapers and websites can provide information about the world; the audience can learn things, and find out what is happening ‘out there.’

3. Personal relationships: the audience can chat to each other about events of the day, sharing opinions and information about current events, celebrity news, sports and so on. It provides an opportunity for social interaction.

4. Personal identity: audience members can compare themselves with people in the news, imagining how they would react in similar circumstances. Some people like to identify with a newspaper and describe themselves as ‘a Sun reader’ or ‘a Guardian reader.’

• Look at the front page of a popular newspaper, or the home page of a popular
press website.
– How does it appeal to each of the four needs?
– Which of the four needs seems most important here? What is your reason for
this?
– Why do you think this need is the most important?
– Does it relate to the needs of the particular demographic, or audience group?

From Devon County Council's Teaching the Popular Press Pack

Popular Press - Institution

• Institutions are the companies who produce newspapers.
• They operate as profit-making businesses.
• They make money partly through the cover price of the newspaper, but mainly
through selling advertising space in the newspaper / on the website.
• The advertising should appeal to the same specific audience group that the
newspaper targets.

Key Institutions connected to the Press

• News International Ltd. Owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation, it publishes The Sun, The News of the World, The Times, and The Sunday Times.

• Associated Newspapers. A subsidiary of the Daily Mail and General Trust, it publishes the Daily Mail, The Mail on Sunday, Metro and London Lite.

• Express Newspapers. Owned by Richard Desmond they publish the Daily Express,
• Sunday Express and Daily Star.

• Trinity Mirror plc. A large British newspaper and magazine publisher. As well as 240 regional titles, it publishes the Daily Mirror, Sunday Mirror, the People, Sunday Mail and the Daily Record.

• The Press Complaints Commission (PCC). Funded by the newspaper industry, it acts as an independent regulatory body.

• National Readership Survey (NRS).The NRS is a non profit making organisation which provides estimates of the number and habits of people reading newspapers and
• magazines.

• Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom (CPBF). An independent
• organisation set up to promote a diverse, democratic and accountable media.

Political Allegiance

Most newspapers are considered to have some political leanings; in fact, with the exception of the Mirror, the popular press espouse conservative views. With a General
Election due in 2010, an interesting area of study is the political or ideological function of the Popular Press. It has been known for newspapers to shift their political position. Famously in 1997, the Sun switched its traditional political allegiance and supported New Labour under Tony Blair. Lately, it has decided to back David Cameron’s Conservative Party.

Consider the effect of Cameron-supporting Rupert Murdoch owning the country's most popular newspaper, The Sun, as well as the established broadsheet, The Times - and then consider he has a 38% stake in BSkyB...

Online Newspaper Media Language and Conventions


Media language of websites
• Home page – the main / first page
• Branding – the logos, images, graphics and colour-scheme which create the
recognisable image of the website / institution.
• Above the fold – what you can see on the webpage without scrolling down
• Banner – a horizontal section of the webpage, often with additional
information or advertisements
• Sidebars – a horizontal section of the site, usually at the side of the
page, often containing separate or additional content.
• Banner ads / scrolling ads – adverts in banner form. Scrolling banners
contain moving information.
• Frame – an area for specific content. A website will have several frames,
each for different content.
• Grid – the layout of the frames on the page, similar to the columns in a
newspaper, but are more adaptable.
• Links – allow you to navigate between different pages on this website, and
to link to other sites.
• Flash content – moving image content such as film footage and animations.

Check out The Daily Mail Online Media pack here: http://www.slideshare.net/Venus1/mail-media-pack

Because it's a slideshare site, you may find YOU HAVE BEEN PROTECTED (zzzzzzzzz........) at school, but you should access this at home. There is an exceptionally detailed breakdown of how the Mail sees its online version addressing its audience and which particular areas are popular. You'll notice there are many opportunities for material to be updated and there is an emphasis laid on the interactive nature of the site to give consumers a sense of ownership so they will be more likely to reurn to it.

The Daily Mail Online is here:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/index.html

Print or Online?

Newspapers and news-websites both have advantages:
• A print newspaper can be taken and read anywhere with no technology needed.
However, you do need a shop to buy it from.
• Websites can be downloaded anywhere, if you have the right equipment.
• Websites can include moving images and sound.
• Newspapers can be easier to read, with less information.
• It is easier to interact with websites through forums.
• Websites can be slow to load and awkward to navigate.
• Websites can be updated throughout the day to reflect breaking news.
• Newspapers use up valuable resources in paper and in distributing copies
around the country.

Which is best?
•Do you prefer newspapers or news websites? Explain why you prefer one medium over
another.
• How do you usually access your news?
• Do you think people’s age, location or other factors affect whether they prefer to
access news through print or e-media? Explain why.
• Conduct a survey of people of different ages – does this affect how they receive
their news?
• Look at an edition of a popular newspaper or its website.
• From your survey and research, what demographic is the newspaper / website aiming
at?
• Note down what advertising content the newspaper / website has.
• How well do you think the advertising would appeal to the audience demographic?

The Mirror Online http://www.mirror.co.uk/

• Compare a front page from The Mirror, and the home page of The Mirror
Online. What similarities are there? Look for the masthead, the strap line,
similarities in the logos, design, layout and colour scheme.
• Is there a common recognisable brand identity between the print newspaper
and the website?
• Do you think the website has the same focus on serious news as the newspaper?

Fighting falling circulation

• Like most newspaper groups, Trinity Mirror’s recent history has been of
falling sales, cutting jobs, closing down regional titles and losing
advertising revenue.
• Some ways it has tried to fight the decline are:
– To introduce more interactivity and social media aspects into its online
sites.
– To create spin-off sites like the celebrity gossip site 3am.co.uk.
– To run campaigns like Hope not Hate, with celebrity supporters and lots of
positive news coverage.
– Opportunistic ‘event publishing’ – when Michael Jackson died, within a few
days Trinity Mirror published a ‘tribute magazine,’ priced at £4.99, filled
with photos from their extensive archive.

Do you think The Daily Mirror will survive? Will it still exist in ten or twenty year’s time?

From Devon County Council's Teaching the Popular Press Pack

New Technology and News Gathering

Increased competition in the marketplace from new technology

• Printed newspapers of all kinds have suffered declining circulation for many years now – they are selling less copies.
• People can now get their news in other more convenient ways – mainly on their computer, or their mobile.
• Newspapers used to have a big share of the market in news gathering – with trained reporters and professional camera operators ready to go anywhere to get a story.
• Newspapers also had an excellent network for distributing news – hot off the presses, daily newspapers would arrive at every corner shop and train station first thing in the morning.

News gathering in the 21st century

• New technology, like mobile phones with good quality still and video cameras, means that anyone can take pictures or footage anywhere.
• You don’t need a reporter and camera operator to get pictures of events, or interviews with witnesses.
• If something unexpected happens, ‘ordinary people’ are usually already there to film it. Think of 7/7, for example.
• Sometimes they are called ‘witness journalists,’ ‘grassroots journalists' or ‘accidental journalists.’
• The professional reporter and camera operator are not needed as much any more.

The London Bombings

• The London bombings on July 7th 2005 provided an opportunity for citizen journalists to influence the mainstream news agenda.
• No one was closer to events than those caught up in the bombings, and the footage they provided from their mobile phones was shocking and unedited.
• This first-hand view, rather than professionally shot footage from behind police lines, is often more hard-hitting and emotive.
• The audience like to see real events: they are used to reality TV. Now, mobile phone technology means they can see similarly ‘real’ or ‘amateur’ footage on the news.

News distribution

• The internet and social networking sites means we can all keep in touch without needing the distribution network of the big institutions.
• People can share news pictures and stories on the web, bypassing conventional news institutions. People can set up forums and news groups of their own. They can record their own account of events, and response to events in blogs and on social networking sites.
• The rise of citizen journalists means we are less dependent on the big news providers.

Twitter and flickr

• The Hudson River plane crash on January 15th 2009 story ‘broke’ via twitter.
• Janis Krum was on a ferry on her way to work, when the plane crashed. The first the world knew about it was when she sent out a tweet: ‘There's a plane in the Hudson. I'm on the ferry going to pick up the people. Crazy.’ She also sent out a dramatic picture of the plane half sinking in the river, and passengers crowded on the wing waiting to be rescued.
• While national news organisations quickly swung into action, it was the citizen journalist, empowered by social networking sites that first broke the story - although before we over-romanticise the notion of the citizen-journalist and meember of the public as 'prosumer' (that is, producer and consumer), how often does this happen and did you see news of the Hudson River Rescue in a traditional news outlet?

The future

• Will printed newspapers still exist in 10 or 20 or 50 years time?
• Will websites and personalised updates takeover?
• Will the big news institutions have lost their power?
• Will we all be news producers as well as news consumers?

This was taken from Devon County Council's Teaching the Popular Press Pack - but the mistakes have been corrected...

Tilt Shift Photography Tutorial!


http://www.tiltshiftphotography.net/photoshop-tutorial.php

Online! The Future of the Newspaper Industry

The newspaper industry faces soaring newsprint prices, slumping ad sales, the loss of much classified advertising and precipitous drops in circulation. In recent years the number of newspapers slated for closure, bankruptcy or severe cutbacks has risen—especially in the United States, where the industry has shed a fifth of its journalists since 2001. Revenue has plunged while competition from internet media has squeezed older print publishers.

The debate has become more urgent lately, as a deepening recession has cut profits, and as once-explosive growth in newspaper web revenues (i.e. from advertising) has leveled off, forestalling what the industry hoped would become an important source of revenue.

In the UK, in late 2008, The Independent announced job cuts. In January the chain Associated Newspapers sold a controlling stake in the London Evening Standard as it announced a 24% decline in 2008 ad revenues. In March 2009 parent company Daily Mail and General Trust said job cuts would be deeper than expected, spanning its newspapers, which include the Leicester Mercury, the Bristol Evening Post and The Derby Telegraph. One industry report predicts that 1 in 10 UK print publications will cut its frequency of publication in half, go online only or shut in 2009.

The question is whether the newspaper industry is being hit by a cyclical trough, or whether new technology has rendered newspapers obsolete in their traditional format.

While television's arrival in the 1950s presaged the decline of newspapers' importance as most people's source of daily news, the explosion of the internet in the 1990s and the first decade of the 21st century increased the panoply of media choices available to the average reader while further cutting into newspapers' hegemony as the source of news.

Both television and the Internet bring news to the consumer faster and in a more visual style than newspapers, which are constrained by their physical form and the need to be physically manufactured and distributed. The competing mediums also offer advertisers the opportunity to use moving images and sound. And the internet's search function allows advertisers to tailor their pitch to readers who have revealed what information they're seeking – an enormous advantage.

The Internet has also gone a step further than television in eroding the advertising income of newspapers, as – unlike broadcast media – it proves a convenient vehicle for classified advertising, particularly in categories such as jobs, vehicles, and real estate. Free services have decimated the classified advertising departments of many newspapers, some of which depended on classifieds for 70% of their ad revenue.

Press baron Rupert Murdoch once described the profits flowing from his stable of newspapers as "rivers of gold." But, said Murdoch several years later, "sometimes rivers dry up."

Instead of perusing general interest publications, such as newspapers, readers are more likely to seek particular writers, blogs or sources of information through targeted searches, rendering the agglomeration of newspapers increasingly irrelevant. Power is shifting to the individual journalist from the news outlet with more people seeking out names through search, e-mail, blogs and social media.

Where once the ability to disseminate information was restricted to those with printing presses or broadcast mechanisms, the internet has enabled thousands of individual commentators to communicate directly with others through blogs or instant message services. Even open journalism projects like wikipedia have contributed to the reordering of the media landscape, as readers are no longer restricted to established print organs for information.*

The technology revolution has meant that readers accustomed to waiting for a daily newspaper can now receive up-to-the-minute updates from web portals, bloggers and new services such as Twitter. The expanding reach of broadband internet access means such updates have become commonplace for many users, especially the more affluent, an audience cultivated by advertisers.

In 2005, The Guardian offered a free twelve part weekly podcast series by Ricky Gervais, thus appealing to its younger middle class demographic.

But these new revenue streams, such as that from newspaper web sites, are often a fraction of the sums generated by the previous advertisement- and circulation-driven revenue streams, and so newspapers have been forced to curtail their overhead while simultaneously trying to entice new users. With revenues plummeting, many newspapers have slashed news bureaus and journalists, while still attempting to publish compelling content – much of it more interactive, more lifestyle-driven and more celebrity-conscious.

"As succeeding generations grow up with the Web and lose the habit of reading print," noted The Columbia Journalism Review in 2007, "it seems improbable that newspapers can survive with a cost structure at least 50% higher than their nimbler and cheaper Internet competitors." The problem facing newspapers is generational: while in 2005 an estimated 70% of older Americans read a newspaper daily, fewer than 20% of younger Americans did.

As the demand for news has exploded, so have consumers of the output of newspapers. (Both nytimes.com and washingtonpost.com, for instance, rank among the top 20 global news sites) But those consumers are now reading newspapers online for free, and although newspapers have been able to convert some of that viewership into ad dollars, it is a trickle compared to previous sources. At most newspapers, web advertising accounts for only 10–15% of revenues.

* Somewhat ironically, this is taken from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_of_newspapers

The Press Complaints Commission - accountability of the press?

The Press Complaints Commission (PCC) is a regulatory body for British printed newspapers and magazines, consisting of representatives of the major publishers. The PCC is funded by the annual levy it charges newspapers and magazines. It has no legal powers - all newspapers and magazines voluntarily contribute to the costs of, and adhere to the rulings of, the Commission, making the industry self-regulating.

The pre-cursor to the PCC was the Press Council, a voluntary press organisation founded in 1953 with the aim of maintaining high standards of ethics in journalism, but in the 1980s some newspapers breached these standards and others were unsatisfied with the effectiveness of the council, so the Home Office thus set up a departmental committee to investigate whether a body with formal legal powers should be created to regulate the industry, which eventually led to the PCC and its Code of Practice. Any member of the public can bring a complaint against a publication that has volunteered to meet the standards of the Code. Members of the Commission adjudicate whether the Code has indeed been broken, and, if so, suggest appropriate measures of correction. These have included the printing of a factual correction, an apology or letters from the original complainant. The Commission does not impose financial penalties on newspapers found to have broken the Code.

The first high-profile case handled by the PCC was brought by HRH The Duke of York who claimed that the press were invading the privacy of his small children. The complaint was upheld.

The Code of Practice
The section titles of the code of practice on which judgements are made are as follows:

1.Accuracy
2.Opportunity to reply
3.Privacy
4.Harassment
5.Intrusion into grief or shock
6.Children
7.Children in sex cases
8.Hospitals
9.Reporting of crime
10.Misrepresentation
11.Victims of sexual assault
12.Discrimination
13.Financial journalism
14.Confidential sources
15.Witness payments in criminal trials
16.Payment to criminals

In 2006, the PCC received 3,325 complaints from members of the public. Around two thirds of these were related to alleged factual inaccuracies, one in five related to alleged invasions of privacy and the rest included the lack of right to reply, harassment and obtaining information using covert devices. 90% of cases were resolved to the complainants' satisfaction. 31 of the cases were adjudicated by the Commission before being resolved as the complainants were initially not satisfied by the action recommended by the Commission.

In 2009 the PCC received more than 25,000 complaints, a record number, after an article appeared in the Daily Mail written by Jan Moir about the death of Boyzone singer Stephen Gately. Moir had described events leading up the death as "sleazy" and "less than respectable". On 17 February the PCC confirmed that although it was "uncomfortable with the tenor of the columnist's remarks", it would not uphold the complaints made.

Recently, many publishers have added clauses to the contracts of editors of newspapers and magazines giving them the option to dismiss editors who are judged to have breached the PCC Code of Practice. The PCC claims that by attaching personal significance to the role of the PCC in the editors' mind, its role has become more effective.

Newspapers and the PCC itself are usually quick to claim the success of the PCC and self-regulation of the press. Indeed the Former Prime Minister, Tony Blair, congratulated the PCC on its successes during the week of the Commission's tenth anniversary, but others remain critical of the organisation: Labour MP Clive Soley, speaking in the same week, said that "other regulatory bodies are far stronger, far more pro-active and really do represent the consumer. There are no consumer rights people on the PCC and that is a major failing". The MediaWise Trust, a charitable organisation set up to help people in their dealings with the press says that the self-regulation system has proved to help the rich but not the poor.

The Phone Hacking AffairIn February 2010 the Commision was described as "toothless" by the House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee investigating the News of the World phone hacking affair when telephones of the Royal Household, politicians, celebrities and footballers were tapped by a private investigator hired by The News of the World. Their Royal Editior Clive Goodman was jailed in 2007 for hacking into phone conversation by the Royal Household and editor Andy Coulson resigned.

Starting on 8 July 2009, The Guardian made a series of allegations that the phone hacking activities at the News of the World newspaper had gone further, claiming that the hacking victims included public figures such as politician John Prescott, Manchester United's manager Sir Alex Ferguson and Boris Johnson when he was the opposition spokesman on higher education.

NOTW denied these claims and its parent company News Corporation invited The Guardian to share any evidence it had with the Metropolitan Police. The Police declined to reopen their inquiry in response to the Guardian's reports, but in December 2009 a parliamentary question was tabled about the possible tapping of then-minister Tessa Jowell's phone, and footballer Sol Campbell instructed his solicitor to contact the police.[17]

In February 2010 The Guardian revealed that three mobile phone companies had discovered that over 100 of their customers had had their answerphone messages hacked. The companies identified the customers in 2007 after Scotland Yard passed numbers that had been used by Goodman and his private investigator, Glenn Mulcaire. A freedom of information request by The Guardian found that the police had recovered 91 pin codes for accessing other people's voicemails in material seized from Mulcaire and Goodman.

In addition, contrary to the News of the World claims in 2007, the Guardian in July 2009 said that the activities were known to a range of persons at the paper including then editor Andy Coulson.

The Guardian revealed in July 2009 that NOTW had made payments in excess of £1m to three people subject to phone-hacking, including Professional Footballers Association chairman Gordon Taylor, with the out-of-court settlements subject to secrecy clauses. In July 2009, Private Eye revealed that News Group Newspapers, who owned NOTW and were part of News International, had signed off on the £700,000 out of court payment to Taylor.

The reports led Press Complaints Commission to re-open its inquiry into the matter but it found that it had not been "materially misled", leading Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger to resign from the PCC, and the House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee to reopen its inquiry.

In February 2010 it condemned the testimony of the NOTW witnesses that had appeared before the Committee, referring to "collective amnesia" and "deliberate obfuscation", and noted News International chief executive Rebekah Brooks' refused to appear at all. The Committee concluded, "We strongly condemn this behaviour which reinforces the widely held impression that the press generally regard themselves as unaccountable and that News International in particular has sought to conceal the truth about what really occurred."

This was the lead story in The Guardian, but News International newspapers (The Sun, The Times) downplayed the report, devoting minimal coverage to it. The Times, for example, placed its 230-word story at the bottom of page 15. The Sun managed 135 words under the headline "Report 'hijack'," which highlighted claims by Philip Davies, a Tory MP, that by "smearing" Andy Coulson, who by then had become director of Conservative party communications and planning, Labour committee members "abused the report for petty party political advantage" - even though the Committe had been led by a Conservative MP!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_of_the_World_phone_hacking_affair

Tuesday, 13 April 2010

Galtung and Ruge - News Values - Theory!

Galtung and Ruge (1973) believed that our perception of what constitutes an event is culturally determined and not a natural occurrence – but they also believed that it related to ‘human culture’ and therefore should not vary too much globally.

Their theory argues that the more an event accessed these criteria the more likely it was to be reported on in a newspaper (although the individual factors are inter-related, not independent of one another).

An example: in the Western world we are obsessed with celebrities and their lifestyles. David Beckham splits with Posh Spice and on the same day five children are killed in a minibus accident. The tabloids will carry the Beckham’s story on the front page because we as a society have decided that celebrity gossip is more interesting and news worthy than the other story.

These are 12 of the ‘most significant’ news values from the work of Galtung and Ruge:
1.Frequency
— short-term events like murders are preferred over long-term developments like a famine
2.Threshold
— basically the size of an event indicates his importance
3.Unambiguity
— events do not have to be simple but they must be accessible to the public - i.e. simplified by the media
4.Meaningfulness
— divided into two categories after Galtung and Ruge’s‘Familiarity’: a)
cultural proximity
in which the event agrees with the outlook of a specific culture; b)
relevance
where events will be reported and discussed if they seem to have an impact on the ‘home’ culture, especially athreat
5.Consonance
— or ‘correspondence’ where the familiar is more likely to be thought than the unfamiliar
6.Unexpectedness
— or ‘surprise’ where it is the rarity of an event whichleads to its circulation in the public domain; Dutton notes that the ‘newness’ of the event is usually processed through a familiar context. It has to work with 4 and 5.
7.Continuity
— once a story achieves importance will be continued to be covered for some time
8.Composition
— this is to provide a sense of balance, gloomy news with good news, foreign with domestic.
9.Reference to elite nations
— events are more likely to be reported if they occur in the developed world; the threshold system would apply for developing countries’ events to be reported
10.Reference to elite persons
— the famous and the powerful are more newsworthy than ordinary people
11.Personalisation
— events are seen as actions of people as individuals; an institution may be personalised by reference to a prominent person within that organisation
12.Negativity
— bad news is good for the press and TV news; the threshold is much lower for bad news than for good news

A lot of these appear to be fairly obvious to say the least, but you'll need to think about them and refer to some of the points in your exam in relation to the evaluation of your practical task and its relevance to audience.

Duck Soup - The Mirror Scene!

The Metro


What of The Metro, the free tabloid you can pick up on your bus or metro jorney in the mornings?

Metro is the trading name of a free daily newspaper, launched in London in 1999, and now be found in 14 UK urban centres. Localised editions are distributed in Birmingham, Brighton, Cardiff, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Leeds, Manchester, Liverpool, Tyne and Wear, Sussex, Sheffield, Nottingham, Bristol and Bath. It is part of the same media group as the Daily Mail and The Mail on Sunday (Associated Newspapers Limited), although in some areas, the paper operates as a franchise with a local newspaper publisher, rather than as a wholly owned concern.

Rupert Murdoch is said to have regretted missing the opportunity of launching his own London paper. However, News International, a UK subsidiary of Murdoch's News Corporation, launched a London-based newspaper in 2006 called thelondonpaper. This was closed on 18th September 2009.

The newspaper was designed to be read in 20 minutes. The features section contains a mix of articles on travel, homes, style, health and so on, as well as extensive arts coverage and entertainment listings, cartoons, puzzles etc.

On 8 July 2009, the online version of Metro was merged with London Lite.

It has over 1.35 million readers a day due in part to the papers being left on seats on buses, train or the Underground systems in Glasgow, Tyne and Wear, and London, and then being picked up by the next person to use that seat.

Due to its urban and mainly youthful audience, advertising receipts have been very healthy at a time when its older stablemate, the Evening Standard, had not been performing so well. 2% of readers are ABC1 (upper/middle class social grade), 78% are aged 15–44 and 64% are in work - which, of course, would make sense, because it will be picked up by people on their way to work in the mornings... It looks like a middle-market tabloid, like the Express, Mirror or Mail, but, perhaps, not with the same level of actual news content and some features specific to the area its distributed in. Some of its stories tend to be Mail-like i.e. highlighting crimes with immigrants involved and it seems to prmote a conservative ideology.

The questions are: do people read this who wouldn't normally buy a newspaper? Would you read it instead of buying a newspaper or as well as buying one? How much of a negative effect is having on the fortunes of other daily newspapers?

A2 Prompts for Skills Development G325A

digital technology

• How has digital technology helped you to capture your ideas for media production?

• What benefits do digital technologies offer over analogue? Are there any disadvantages?

• How did digital technology influence your work in post-production – for example in the creation of video effects, or the manipulation of images.

• How have your skills with digital technology developed, and how has this influenced your productions?

• What role might digital technology plan in the distribution of work such as yours?



creativity


• What features of your work would you say are original to you?

• Which media texts and producers have influenced your creative decisions?

• How successfully does your work engage its audience and provoke its interest?

• Consider some of the creative choices you had to make during the course of your production – how to use cameras, lighting, dialogue, colour etc. How did you make these decisions, and how did these contribute to the final production?



research and planning

• How did your research into genre contribute to your production work?

• How did your research into audience contribute to your production work?

• How did your research into institutions responsible for the production and regulation of the media influence your production work?

• What pre-production planning techniques did you employ (scripting, storyboarding, shot-listing, flat-planning etc.)? How effective was your planning – how did it help you in the production phase?

• What did you learn from planning your first production that helped you to improve your planning for the second?

• How did you use audience feedback to influence your production work while it was in progress?



post-production

• How much of your text was ‘created’ only in post-production?

• What technologies did you use to modify your raw material. How did this change the meaning of your work?

• How much did you manipulate sync sound or create new sound for your text? What effect did that have on your text?

• How much of your footage ended up ‘on the cutting room floor’ (unused) and why?



using conventions from real media texts

• In what ways have your productions used or developed conventions adopted from real media products?

• In what ways have your productions challenged or played with conventions adopted from real media products?

• In other words, is your work generic, or postmodern – or both?

• Some media producers adopt a style of working that is quite distinctive – explore how work you have produced may have been influenced by your own favourite producers/directors/designers/publishers.

Hillsborough and The Sun and Audience Theory

The Manipulative Model, like the Hypodermic Syringe Model, would see the institution (here, Rupert Murdoch's News International) being able to change the way of thinking by an audience which is passive. That is, the audience will believe the angle The Sun takes, that the representations it produces are truthful and accurate and will accept them as real and will be influenced by their ideology.

An opposing view - the Pluralist or Market model - would point out that the Manipulative Model has not taken into account the choices the audience have made in their media consumption. There are other newspapers with variations on The Sun's views or even completely different views. No-one forces the audience to read The Sun. IT might be argued that The Sun had adapted itself to reflect the views of a large proportion of the population (hence its backing for Margaret Thatcher, then switching to Tony Blair's New Labour, then switiching again to David Cameron's Tory party. Remember, it has to sell to attract advertisers who, in turn, bring money into the company. Pluralists believe that different groups and interests in society are competing for audiences and the most successful are those that manage to appeal to the widest audiences. The model suggests audiences are active in the way in which they choose their media.

The third model - the hegemonic model - acknowledges that much of the media (whether Labour or Tory-supporting) is under the control by a relatively small group of interests (white, middle-class and male) and that the viewpoints associated with these groups become embedded in their products, though the promotion of these views is not necessarily conscious; indeed, these views are seen as 'common-sense' or 'normal'. Some parts of the audience will try to resist, making different choices and challenge the idea of the consensus.

After the Hillsborough disaster on 15 April 1989 when a crowd surge led to the death of ninety-six football fans in a game between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest, The Sun accused Liverpool fans of picking the pockets of the dead, urinating on dead bodies and attacking policemen who were trying to rescue people. The stories were unfounded and led to a campaign to boycott the Sun among Livepool fans on Merseyside, causing the circulation to drop by 200,000. The paper apologised but there are still shopkeepers in the Liverpool who refuse to stock it.

A2 British Soaps and Audiences

British Soaps and Audiences:
http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/archive/bsc/pdfs/research/soap.pdf

The Popularity of British Soaps by Laura Webb:
http://tv-soap-operas.suite101.com/article.cfm/the_popularity_of_british_soap_operas

Why are Soap Operas so Popular? by Helena Robinson
http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Students/hlr9501.html

The TV Soap Opera Genre and its Viewers by Daniel Chandler
http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Modules/TF33120/soaps.html

Male Viewers of Soap Operas by Anna Catherine Prescott
http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Students/acp9601.html

Popular Television and its Audience by David Buckingham - concentrates on Eastenders and young viewers
http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Modules/TF33120/bucking1.html

Uses and Gratifications of Soap Operas
http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Modules/TF33120/bucking1.html

Cultivation Theory
http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Modules/TF33120/bucking1.html

Media, Gender and Identity by David Gauntlett
http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Modules/TF33120/bucking1.html

Active TV Viewing
http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Modules/TF33120/bucking1.html

Audience Theory: An Introduction
http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Modules/TF33120/bucking1.html

Media and Collective Identity - presentation by Julian McDougall (hope you can make sense of it...)
http://prezi.com/xfm9d2eaw7of/media-and-collective-identity/

Soap Opera Links
http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Modules/TF33120/bucking1.html

A Level Music/Film projects

http://www.mediaexemplar.com/

Since I'm adding this at home, it remains to be seen whether you can access this at school or whether YOU HAVE BEEN PROTECTED and have to access it at home!

Monday, 12 April 2010

Popular Press

Loads of good advice and links etc here:
http://popularpress-mediastudies.blogspot.com/

Representation

The media doesn’t show reality – it shows a particular version of reality. It often uses stereotypes to get across messages about certain groups of people. The views of a newspaper will often affect how they represent certain people.

Representation

• What is the News? A common misconception is that newspapers faithfully and accurately report on the significant stories of the day. But news is what newspaper institutions have chosen to report on and think will sell to their readership. A useful area to study would be to examine how newspapers source and select news stories and to examine the news values that underpin news selection. By analysing news values as presented on front pages and in headlines from the Popular Press on one day, conclusions can be made about audience appeal and newspaper identity.

• Another area of study is to look at how newspapers represent events, groups and individuals. While the industry is frequently criticised for its focus on gossip and celebrity, events worldwide are less widely reported. When global stories are reported on, stories of revolution, disasters, wars and famine give a very negative representation of other countries, particularly third world countries.

• Another useful area of study is to examine how different social groups are represented in newspapers. Are newspapers guilty of creating and perpetuating stereotypes?

• When studying representation, it is worth looking at the controls and constraints under which the Popular Press operates, e.g. the National Union of Journalists Code of Professional Conduct, and the role of the Press Complaints Commission.

Look at these different covers from British newspapers from the day that Michael Jackson's death was reported. What impression do the papers give of Jackson? How is the story set out? How is it incorporated into the individual newspaper's front page? What does each cover say about news values and target audience?









Now look at the way President Obama's victory was reported in The Daily Mail and The Daily Mirror. Look at the choice of photos - the camera angles; Obama's posture and body language; the language of the actual text; the layout. How is Obama represented; can we learn anything about the ideology of the newspaper from this representation; is there anything else about the front page that tell us about the nature of the newspapers and their target audience?


Here is the cover of The Daily Mirror 14 May 2004. The paper had published photos of British soldiers abusing Iraqi prisoners and it turned out they were faked. How does the newspaper represent itself? Look at the actual language used; the sixe of the headline; the colours; the layout. It should be noted that paper considered itself a Labour supporter and under the editorship of Piers Morgan, the traditional 'red top' masthead was changed to black, probably to distinguish it from the more sensationalist end if the tabloid market. It has been changed back...

The images for this section are from Devon County Council's Teaching the Popular Press pack.

Circulation Figures for the British Press

Feb ABCs: Qualities plunge but Star and Sun are up

12 March 2010
By Dominic Ponsford

National newspaper print circulations continued to take a battering in February as readers faced with thinner newspapers which are more expensive than ever voted with their pockets.

All the UK quality nationals now cost £1, but the continued economic slump means that advertising remains scarce and paginations are low by the standards of recent years.

The Daily Telegraph dropped 9.8 per cent year on year, The Guardian was down 16 per cent, The Independent down 11 per cent and The Times dropped 16.9 per cent.

Looking at UK paid-for sales only, the Financial Times dropped 8.8 per cent to an average of 79,864 sales per day. It is now selling for £2 a copy on weekdays versus £1.80 a year ago.

The red-top and mid-market titles fared much better with the cut-price (20p) Daily Star and Sun managing year-on-year rises of three per cent and 0.6 per cent respectively.

The Sun had special cause for celebration managing its first year-on-year increase since July 2008.

No UK-wide national Sunday newspaper managed to increase sales year on year in February and the two slimmest quality Sundays, The Observer and the Independent on Sunday, were the biggest fallers down 20.4 per cent and 12.3 per cent respectively.

The year on year drops for the quality titles partly reflect a decision across titles to reduce bulk give-aways. The Guardian and Observer drops also reflect a reduction in foreign distribution.

The relaunch of The Observer happened mid-way through the audit period so we will find out next month what effect that has had on sales.

National newspaper circulaton figures for February 2010 (source ABC)

Figures given are per issue sale for the month and percentage change year on year

National Morning Popular

Daily Mirror 1,234,967 -6.91

Daily Record 328,183 -6.00

Daily Star 803,859 2.96

The Sun 2,972,763 0.63

National Morning Mid Market

Daily Express 672,951 -5.92

Daily Mail 2,111,204 -3.09

National Morning Quality

The Daily Telegraph 685,177 -9.82

Financial Times 390,203 -7.32

The Herald 55,710 -7.38

The Guardian 284,514 -16.38

The Independent 183,547 -10.88

The Scotsman 45,695 -7.04

The Times 505,062 -16.90

National Morning Sporting

Racing Post 52,982 -4.64

National Sunday Popular

Daily Star Sunday 347,374 -3.55

News of the World 2,993,709 -0.87

Sunday Mail 397,458 -9.39

Sunday Mirror 1,155,975 -5.72

The People 541,470 -7.52

National Sunday Mid Market

Sunday Express 575,314 -9.52

Sunday Post 337,699 -7.67

The Mail on Sunday 1,978,316 -6.89

National Sunday Quality

Independent on Sunday 155,661 -13.27

The Observer 342,467 -20.42

Scotland on Sunday 58,278 -6.70

Sunday Herald 41,955 1.29

The Sunday Telegraph 516,238 -10.47

The Sunday Times 1,122,165 -7.58

http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&storycode=45172&c=1


Of course, you have to bear in mind that the population of Great Britain (not including Northern Ireland) is roughly 60 million, so there are an awful lot of people who don't get any newspapers at all. The number of daily Guardian readers could fit comfortably into six St James' Parks (capacity: 52,2387).

Broadsheets and Tabloids

From http://journalism.about.com/od/trends/a/tabloidsbroadsheets.htm

Broadsheets
Broadsheet refers to the most common newspaper format, which is typically 11 to 12 inches wide and 20 or more inches long. Many of the nation's most respected newspapers - The Times, The Guardian, The Independent and so on were all broadsheets until very recently and still maintain the same serious in-depth journalistic approach to the news. Others, like The Financial Times and The Daily Telegraph, remain broadsheet papers. Broadsheet papers are usually six columns across.

Beyond their size, broadsheet papers tend to employ a traditional approach to news that emphasizes in-depth coverage and a sober tone in articles and editorials. Broadsheet readers often tend to be fairly affluent and educated, with many of them living in the suburbs.

Tabloids
In the technical sense, tabloid refers to a type of newspaper that typically measures 11 X 17 inches and is five columns across, narrower than a broadsheet newspaper. Since tabloids are smaller, their stories tend to be shorter than those found in broadsheets.

And while broadsheet readers tend to be upscale suburbanites, tabloid readers are often working class residents of big cities. Indeed, many city dwellers prefer tabloids because they are easy to carry and read on the subway or bus.

Tabloids also tend to be more irreverent and slangy in their writing style than their more serious broadsheet brothers. In a crime story, a broadsheet refers to a police officer, while the tabloid calls him a cop. And while a broadsheet might spend dozens of column inches on "serious" news - say, a major bill being debated in parliament - a tabloid is more likely to zero in on a heinous sensational crime story or celebrity gossip.

In fact, the word tabloid has come to be associated with sensationalism and, with the notable exception of The Daily Mirror, conservative views, especially on law and order, ties with Europe, immigration and anything they consider challenges what they constitute as 'normal'.

But there's an important distinction to be made here. True, there are the over-the-top tabloids like The Daily Star, but there are also the so-called respectable tabloids - such as the Daily Mail, The Daily Mirror and The Daily Express. While it would be difficult to compare the efforts of the Daily Mail to that, both it and the Express undoubtedly see themselves as a cut above the Mirror and several cuts above The Sun! Both papers tend to cater for a more middle class audience than the Red Tops.

A Primer to Britain's Top Tabs


The British tabloids are their own brand of journalism. Whereas American tabloids have occasionally broken news stories but are seen more as celebrity gossip bastions, the British tabloids jump on news stories with the same ferocity as they pounce on celebrity gossip. The result is an eclectic mix of hard news with unique (often anonymous) sourcing and traditional tabloid sleaze. And since tabloids are open to paying good money for story information, they're likely to get scoops that the traditional broadsheets miss -- though raising ethics questions at the same time. It's a cutthroat second dimension of journalism that draws a rabid following both across the pond and around the globe.

• The Sun: Owned by Rupert Murdoch's News Corp., The Sun is splashy, trashy, and often scooping the competition. Published in the U.K. and Ireland, The Sun has the highest circulation of any English-language daily paper in the world. Regular features include the Page Three Girl, which some have decried as pornographic. Politically, the paper espouses strong views on law and order and immigration; it endorsed Mrs Thatcher, continiuing its support for the Condervatives through the 1990s. For example on the day of the general election of 9 April 1992, its front-page headline, encapsulating its antipathy towards the Labour leader Neil Kinnock, read "If Kinnock wins today, will the last person to leave Britain please turn out the lights". Two days later The Sun was so convinced its front page had swung a close election for the Conservatives it declared "It's The Sun Wot Won It".. However, after Thatcher was replaced, aware of the lack of support for the Conservatives and doubtless not wanting to be seen to be backing a loser, the paper switched its allegiance to Tony Blair's New Labour, though it continued to support the Conservative view on issues like immigration, Europe and it opposed Labour's support for a minimum wage. Switched allegiance back to the Conseratives in 2009. It has been critical of Gordon Brown’s policies and the Tories were clearly rising in the opinion polls. "The Sun believes - and prays - that the Conservative leadership can put the great back into Great Britain". Murdoch’s News Corp is notorious for backing conservative causes.

Between 1994 and 1996, The Sun's circulation peaked. Its highest average sale was in the week ending 16 July 1994, when the daily figure was 4,305,957. The highest ever one-day sale was on 18 November 1995 (4,889,118), although the cover price had been cut to 10p. The highest ever one-day sale at full price was on 30 March 1996 (4,783,359). The majority of its readers tend to be working class and from a low income group.

Facts about The Sun and its audience can be found here: http://www.nicommercial.com/thesun-newsoftheworldmedia/audience-insight

• News of the World: Also owned by News Corp., this is essentially the Sunday version of The Sun. It originally cost three pence in 1843. The right-leaning newspaper enjoys sales of about 3.4 million each Sunday.

• The Daily Mirror: This consistently left-of-centre tabloid was launched in 1903 as a newspaper run by and geared toward women, but new leadership the next year and a new direction resulted in all of the female journalists being fired. In the 1970s, the Sun surpassed the Mirror in circulation and the Mirror has since been plagued by declining circulation. A famous front page after the 2004 U.S. presidential elections bore a picture of George W. Bush and the headline "How can 59,054,087 people be so DUMB?"

• The People: This Sunday-only paper is owned by the company that runs the Daily Mirror, and considers itself a competitor to News of the World.

• The Daily Mail: Britain's oldest tabloid has a storied history, including having supported Adolf Hitler. Nowadays, the politically conservative paper has the 12th-largest circulation in the world among English-language dailies. It is published by Associated Newspapers, the same company that publishes the free morning tabloid, Metro, available on public transport systems in 14 UK cities. News International, a UK subsidiary of Murdoch's News Corporation, launched a London-based newspaper in 2006 called thelondonpaper but his was closed on 18th September 2009 because it couldn’t make headway against the exising products. The majority of The Mail's readers come from the A/B high income group and are over 55.

• The Daily Express: Founded in 1900 and introducing both newspaper gossip and the crossword puzzle to British readers, this paper became a tabloid format in 1977 and politically leans conservative. A major rival is the Daily Mail. Its front page banner describes the Express as "The World's Greatest Newspaper."

• The Daily Star: Launched in 1978, this became Britain's first new newspaper since the Daily Mirror debuted in 1903. It's published by the same company that produces the Daily Express, and politically leans to the right. The paper also has a daily scantily clad woman, mimicking The Sun's Page Three Girl.

In the UK, three previously broadsheet daily newspapers—The Independent, The Times, and The Scotsman—have switched to tabloid size in recent years, although they call it "compact" to avoid the down-market connotation of that word. Similarly, when referring to the down-market tabloid newspapers the alternative term "red-top" (referring to their traditionally red-coloured mastheads) is increasingly used, to distinguish them from the up-market compact newspapers. The Guardian, ever wanting to be a bit special, shrank down from broadsheet to Berliner - i.e. a slightly smaller version of the broadsheet.

http://worldnews.about.com/od/7/qt/britishtabs.htm

GCSE Media - Popular Press


Definition: In the context of the 2010 Controlled Test, the Popular Press refers to mass circulation national newspapers, targeted at the popular end of the market.
This would include such titles as The Sun, The Daily Mirror, The Daily Express, The
Daily Mail, The Daily Star, The News of the World, The People, The Daily Record, the Sunday Mail and their associated websites.

For the purposes of the 2010 controlled test the non-contemporary context is focused on recent history, particularly the last ten years and the rise of on-line newspapers. Get that?

The following was 'borrowed' from a number of sources:

Key Terms


• Tabloid – a size of newspaper (43 x 28 cm aprox) usually more
sensationalist and less serious in their news coverage
• Broadsheet – larger format (74cm x 59cm approx) more serious and detailed
coverage of news
• Caption – descriptive words next to a picture
• Masthead – title block of a newspaper
• Slogan – reinforces the identity of the paper
• Leader – the lead story for a page
• Kicker – an article designed to jump out from the rest of the page
• Copy – printed articles in a newspaper
• Paparazzi – photographers who specialise in taking celebrity photos
• News Values – the criteria editors use to select news stories.
• Stereotypes – A pre conceived idea of a social group , often reinforced by
the popular press, e.g youth as yobs
• Convergence – as a result in the increase Media technology there is a
melding together of communication forms. Such as newspapers and the internet.
• Branding – the distinctive features by which we recognise products
• Puffs – star or circle shapes with word like ‘exclusive’ or ‘special.’
• Column – the copy is arranged in columns.
• The splash – the main front page story.
• Headlines – attract attention to the main story.
• Subheadings – give additional information for the headline.
• Double-decker headline – a headline over two lines.
• Multi-deck headline – a headline over three or more lines.
• By-line – who wrote the article
• Strapline – the ‘slogan’ under the mast head, e.g. ‘first for news.’
• Tabloid tag - a phrase prefacing the name of the person written about to add some
explanatory detail to the person written about e.g 'Love Rat John Terry...'
• Topic paragraph - the opening paragraph that effectively sums up the main point of
the story
• Cover price – the price of the newspaper.
• Ears – the top left and top right hand corners – often they have special attention-
grabbing features.
• Puffs – star or circle shapes with word like ‘exclusive’ or ‘special.’
• Caption – the words by the picture which explain what it is.
• Circulation – The number of copies a newspaper sell
• Readership – The number of people that read each copy of the paper
Image from http://popularpress-mediastudies.blogspot.com/

Key Conventions of the Popular Press

• Headlines. The most prominent feature of any article is the headline. Front page
headlines are particularly important as they aim to grab the reader’s attention and
help sell the newspaper. Headlines are usually short and catchy. The Popular
Press place particular value on headlines which can dominate the front page.
• The Pictures. As with the headline, a good picture is vital to grabbing the
attention of the audience. Newspaper photographs can be very powerful, and
sometimes tell the story in their own right. Some photographs are very famous
and have become the defining images of certain historical events.
• Captions. Photographs are accompanied by captions. Captions anchor an image
and help the reader interpret the photograph. The language of a caption rarely
just describes the image, instead it adds to the angle of the accompanying article.
• The Copy. Copy is written by reporters. It is written in a certain style and format
which aims to quickly establish the facts of the story, and to hook the reader into
reading the whole story.
• Masthead. The masthead is the title that identifies the newspaper. The use of
colour, language, symbol and design all help create the identity of the newspaper. Many Popular Press titles are known as Redtops due to their use of red in the masthead.

• The key conventions of the Popular Press are common to all newspapers; however, the way they are employed is quite distinct from the Quality Press. Typically, front pages are designed to grab attention, and use short, bold headlines and a large dramatic photograph. Even within the Popular Press itself, there is variety and difference between titles. Students should be encouraged to examine the brand identities of different newspaper titles as expressed through their design, content and language.

• Using large pictures and shorter copy than the Quality Press, the Popular Press often relies on pictures to tell the story. Newspapers use a mix of snatched and posed photography and images can be cropped or enlarged. The way a picture is positioned and the accompanying caption are all part of a number of factors that can affect our interpretation of an image.